-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.2k
gh-130607: Extend and cleanup IPv6 tests #121518
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
|
Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
|
Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
|
Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry. Add one using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool. If this change has little impact on Python users, wait for a maintainer to apply the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would still want an issue for refactoring this but a skip news is fine. The issue should indicate which tests need to be refactored (essentially all those using == + assertTrue/False; we should use better assert methods) and why some need to be extended.
We can however improve even the testsdoing == by using assertEqual. Traceback will be nicer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO this is an improvement; any refactoring can be done in a separate PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me :-)
|
You do not need to update the branch. That will |
Extend IPv6 tests and made little syntax refactoring (cherry picked from commit 9f0879b) Co-authored-by: Ilya Bazhenov <[email protected]>
|
GH-130678 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
Extend IPv6 tests and made little syntax refactoring (cherry picked from commit 9f0879b) Co-authored-by: Ilya Bazhenov <[email protected]>
|
GH-130679 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
Extend IPv6 tests and made little syntax refactoring (cherry picked from commit 9f0879b) Co-authored-by: Ilya Bazhenov <[email protected]>
Extend IPv6 tests and made little syntax refactoring (cherry picked from commit 9f0879b) Co-authored-by: Ilya Bazhenov <[email protected]>
Extend IPv6 tests and made little syntax refactoring
Hope this work make ipaddress better.